Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Multiple\s+e\-mails\s+when\s+replying\s+back\s+to\s+the\s+list\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Multiple\s+e\-mails\s+when\s+replying\s+back\s+to\s+the\s+list\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Multiple e-mails when replying back to the list... (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:34:02 -0700; I have complained, for years, that e-mails should go back to the LIST rather than the sender. I still believe this, but it's NOT the topic of this message (Thank GOD, some of you say...) One of my co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00620.html (8,257 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Multiple e-mails when replying back to the list... (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:51:19 -0400; I sometimes *choose* to send a reply to the sender in addition to the list a if they are like me they do not read everything on the list, the concrete issue being one. I only read the ones that look; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00624.html (7,837 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Multiple e-mails when replying back to the list... (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:54:08 -0400 (EDT); Yep, many of people filter our email, and mail to lists gets put into a mailbox with a lower personal priority. If the response should really go to both, then I send to both, such as when I answer a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00625.html (8,389 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]