Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NVIS\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+NVIS\s+Antennas\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] NVIS Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Dick" <dmcnutt3@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:42:58 -0400; We used NVIS antennas in Viet Nam to communicate with the A teams...and they ranged from 2 to 20 foot above ground...the base stations were generally not in the jungle....worked great out to about 50; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00594.html (7,294 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS Antennas (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:57:31 -0400; Given that we have for decades communicated with subs using miles of buried antennas, and folks like G3BDQ and others have experimented with buried Ham antennas, one is well-advised to avoid absolute; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00598.html (8,682 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:33:07 -0400; using have to work this No one ever said contacts can't be made with crappy lossy antennas. At least I didn't say it. All I said is the only thing that happens electrically as an antenna is lowered; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00602.html (8,730 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS Antennas (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:58:50 -0400; I wasn't even pretending to comment on the physics, just waxing philosophical as I wander around the 'net waiting for the xyl to return from an absurdly extended on-call day working at the hospital.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00603.html (9,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]