Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Need\s+help\s+identifying\s+an\s+old\s+tri\-bander\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Need\s+help\s+identifying\s+an\s+old\s+tri\-bander\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Need help identifying an old tri-bander (score: 1): Author: N6FD <n6fd@hughes.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:05:15 -0800; I bought a tri-bander used from a silent key's estate. His wife did not have any documentation for the antenna. Given the state of the antenna and the tower that I got with it, it was probably put up; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00251.html (8,835 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Need help identifying an old tri-bander (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:23:57 -0800; Sounds like a Cushcraft ATB-34. They were just discussed at length here on the reflector. Including a link for the manual. Do a search at the tower talk archives and the manual link should pop up. Or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00252.html (10,354 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Need help identifying an old tri-bander (score: 1): Author: N6FD <n6fd@hughes.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:49:19 -0800; Thanks to the list for such a prompt answer. After downloading the manual, it indeed does appear to be an ATB-34. Now I just have to refurbish the traps, replace some lost hardware and get the tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00253.html (9,699 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Need help identifying an old tri-bander (score: 1): Author: "Rroger (K8RI on TowerTalk)" <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:08:03 -0500; IIRC my ATB43 had 3 elements with traps and a single 10 meter reflector with no traps. I do remember the driven element went into a phenolic tube which was held in place by two 1/4-20 SS round head s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00261.html (12,398 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]