Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+New\s+Tribander\s+Comparison\s+Report\s+Requested\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] New Tribander Comparison Report Requested (score: 1)
Author: RLVZ@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:51:53 EST
Hi Steve, I've purchased all 3 of your antenna comparison reports and they are excellent. I appreciate you taking time to do them. I'd love to see an Update to the Tribander Report. There are many ot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00238.html (7,940 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tribander Comparison Report Requested (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Smidt" <xveoneov@primus.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:53:22 -0400
Isn't it unfair to compare Sixbanders with simple Tribanders?? :>) 73, Carl VE9OV _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireles
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00239.html (9,880 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tribander Comparison Report Requested (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:31:41 -0000
By Sixbanders, I take it you mean the SteppIR antennas, right? Easy, just compare them on 20, 15 and 10 like the other antennas. I think at least the contest crowd doesn't worry too much about the ot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00243.html (11,649 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu