Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Number\s+of\s+Radials\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Number\s+of\s+Radials\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Number of Radials? (score: 1): Author: heatwole@clark.net (Nat Heatwole); Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:07:12 -0500; I've search the Internet as well as ON4UN's book very thoroughly, however I have not found a conclusive answer to the question of how many raised radials to use on a lowband vertical antenna. So, I t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00203.html (7,241 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Number of Radials? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:47:50 -0600; N6BV has postulated that elevated radials need to be 0.05 WL (wavelengths) or more above ground for good efficiency. That corresponds to 7 ft on 40M, 14 ft on 80M, 28 ft on 160M. My 80M elevated GP w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00211.html (8,905 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Number of Radials? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:07:32 -0500; That would not be a good assumption, because clearly what happens is as more radials are used the system becomes less dependent of height. With eight radials at height of 1/4 wl, a system was measur; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00218.html (8,890 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]