Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OCF\s+Dipole\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+OCF\s+Dipole\s+Questions\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:13:24 -0500; A local here is about to put an offset center fed dipole up in the air. I think this antenna claims to work 10-80m. This is most likely going to be in the 40-45ft high range at best. A couple of ques; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00115.html (7,258 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: Jon <kd5sfa@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 23:49:11 +0000; It should not matter which end is connected to the tree or tower as long as they are insulated from them. Where does it make best sense for the feedline to connect and be supported? I have mine offse; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00117.html (9,270 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: Ron Young <youngron@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 19:30:10 -0500; Mike, it is a dipole. No matter how it is fed it is a dipole. Where you place the OCF point (which end is where) is what is most convenient for coax to shack. Yes the antenna might work best flat but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00118.html (9,714 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:07:42 -0500; Unlike a resonant dipole the pattern varies a lot depending on the frequency. John KK9A A local here is about to put an offset center fed dipole up in the air. I think this antenna claims to work 10-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00121.html (8,285 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:20:18 -0500; Whoever had this runnet.com email address and changed or deleted it should update their towertalk subscription. Subject : ATTENTION l'adresse mail de votre Corres- pondant change.. Le Destinataire de; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00122.html (8,621 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway $N5WA$" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 21:09:11 -0600; You could model the antenna with the dimensions you have and get a good idea of how the pattern would look with the antenna "flat" and with the center higher than the ends. Obviously, the pattern wil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00124.html (11,608 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF Dipole Questions (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:15:04 -0600; Setting aside the question of whether an OCF is a good design (I'll let K9YC take that question), it's important to note that even if you could get a good pattern off it (owing to feedline radiation); /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00135.html (11,668 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]