Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Optimum\s+Height\s+for\s+10M\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Optimum\s+Height\s+for\s+10M\s+Beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1): Author: \"Dick Green\"."<dick.green@valley.net ("Dick Green".); Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 15:55:26 -0500; I recall seeing some posts a while back about the optimum height for a 10M beam, but I don't recall what it was. Can anybody refresh my memory? I'm thinking about doing the ARRL 10M contest. I've got; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00044.html (8,952 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1): Author: wd4ngb@sprynet.com (Bruce Richards); Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 23:05:19 +0000; Hello Dick. I have been operating 10m for many years and have found that there is no perfect height. The only solution is stacks. At this time I am using a single 7 element monobander at 90 feet. Thi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00050.html (10,873 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Optimum Height for 10M Beam (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 12:17:36 -0600; Optimum Heights (once again!) de N4KG For FLAT ground, generally, you need a HIGH AND LOW antenna to cover ALL the angles that the ionosphere will support. I find that my 40 ft high antennas beat out; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00325.html (8,528 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]