Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phasing\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Phasing\s+Question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:27:26 -0800 (PST); Hello all...I have a question regarding coaxial phasing that has been totally confusing me. Let's say I wanted to phase 2, or possibly, 4 short verticals in a swichable array by means of coax delay l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00084.html (7,249 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:14:54 -0800 (GMT-08:00); --Original Message-- stuff on this, well beyond what you'll get in some short emails on the reflector. But.. in a multi element array, there's more to it than just the length of the coax.. the elemen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00086.html (10,449 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:33:39 -0800; I asked this same question here a couple of months ago, and from what I received in answer, I assume unless you have a meter to detrmine inpedance, reactance, phase angles, vectors, etc, it is not wo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00087.html (7,377 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: wa3afs@inav.net; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:55:20 -0500; I used to phase a pair of coaxial inverted Ls (a pair on 160m, a pair on 75m, and a pair on 40m). I did the following: 1. The feedlines to each antenna had to be the same length. Each antenna was sep; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00090.html (8,969 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:36:30 -0800 (GMT-08:00); --Original Message-- That depends on what you mean by worth doing. If you don't get it right, all that really happens is the beam points somewhere other than you expect AND you lose some back and sid; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00095.html (9,464 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:41:15 -0000; Yes you can use add a parasitic element (reflector or director) and create a vertical array. John KK9A I asked this same question here a couple of months ago, and from what I received in answer, I as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00107.html (7,777 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:06:34 -0600; Hello Tom! I have been using a parasitic array on 160 meters for years with great success. My parasitic elements (4 of them) are all cut as directors. There are 3 modes to the end of these elements.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00109.html (9,530 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing Question (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:09:15 -0600; Tom, One further comment... Greg, W8WWV has recently modeled the 160 meter parasitic array that I use with EZNEC. The real world F/B was exactly where Greg said it would be. This gives good confidenc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00112.html (10,173 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]