Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Position\s+of\s+fall\s+arrest\s+lanyard\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: Neil Mayo <neilmayo@brightok.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:12:12 -0500
I know this has been tackle before, but can I please have your thoughts on which is the best position for the fall arrest lanyard, front or back. I use the back, but ran across this picture today htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00265.html (7,084 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:20:29 -0400
That's the first time I've ever seen the fall arrest lanyard connected to the front. I would think the likelihood of back/spinal trauma would be far greater with a frontal connection. It seems like
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00271.html (7,941 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:44:56 -0500
The fall arrest lanyard can connect to only one ring. Its position is dictated by the harness you are wearing. Most of the harnesses I have seen have the ring in the back. 73, Keith NM5G I know this
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00273.html (8,306 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:57:10 -0400
First, as always let me say I promote the use of fall arrest gear in addition to the climbing gear. Like anything else: It all depends. It depends on the harness you are wearing, where it contacts t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00279.html (13,606 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:58:08 -0400
Excellent question. I've wondered the same thing. There have been a number of posts on this reflector indicating that serious injury can occur if you fall with a fall-arrest lanyard attached to the f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00280.html (10,179 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:06:38 -0700
There's also a difference between "likely to happen" and "could happen". Back in my younger and more foolish days, I used to rock climb using a "swami belt" as the sole means of attachment to the rop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00289.html (11,378 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Position of fall arrest lanyard (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:19:27 EDT
on which is the best position for the fall arrest lanyard, front or back. I use the back, but ran across this picture today The correct place for a fall arrest lanyard is the D-ring between your shou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00317.html (8,390 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu