- 1. [TowerTalk] Quad questions, long(ish) (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Sole <msole@loxinfo.co.th>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:08:34 +0700
- It's that time of year again. With the better weather now here and a little time to play I need to get outside and do some much needed antenna work. Way back during the stormy season my 2 el lightnin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00021.html (9,888 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad questions, long(ish) (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:19:28 -0500
- Martin, I can comment on your plan to use relays to short out the inactive drivers. It adds unnecessary complications. I do agree that it is essential to short the inactive driver elements, but that
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00024.html (13,513 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad questions, long(ish) (score: 1)
- Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:28:06 -0800
- Whether you short a nearby 2 wl quad element or leave it open, it will still be resonant and carry a fair amount of current. I think the benefit of shorting the element is that the currents are symme
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00026.html (8,074 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad questions, long(ish) (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott McClements" <kc2pih@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:39:15 -0500
- What I would recommend is mounting the quad like a "+" rather than a "X" and then you can support the coax and feedpoint properly with a spreader arm. To me this is the logical way to do it plus it h
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00032.html (7,885 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu