Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Quest\s+for\s+better\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Quest\s+for\s+better\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Quest for better (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:12:23 +0000; For years I have settled for an 80M dipole 60' up. My particular interest is to target EU. According to YT arrival angle data, most of the action is in the 12 to 20 degree range and also in the 2 to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00121.html (8,627 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Quest for better (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:00:37 -0400; Try feeding that 160 meter inverted el at the end (hi-Z) against ground on eighty meters. Avoids a lot of the 1/4 wave conundrums and has a pattern much like a hemisphere. I used up 63 feet and out 7; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00130.html (10,745 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Quest for better (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:05:21 -0600; dipoles, there is a noticable benefit going from 60 to 90 ft for EU / AF. For the the really long haul, there seems to be an additional benefit going from 90 to 120 ft or so. (Wish I had taken my 13; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00146.html (7,810 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]