Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Question\s+about\s+lowering\s+a\s+Fold\-Over\s+tower\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: RLVZ@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:10:27 -0500 (EST)
Hi Guys, I'm going to lower a 90' Heights aluminum fold over tower with my car tomorrow evening. I've done this before without destroying the tower so hopefully I can have another successful lowering
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00008.html (8,498 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:24:14 -0700
Hi Dick, I'd use a falling derrick to do it that way if I were you. It can be as easy as a couple long 2x4's bolted together at the top to make an "A". Your cable will go right over the crotch of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00009.html (9,436 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:58:12 -0800
I'll second this. I just lowered my 50 foot aluminum Glen Martin tower using a 16 foot falling derrick. Mine is made of lumber, but you could also get a 20 foot waterpipe. The physics are much more i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00010.html (7,804 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <kk9a@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:20:27 -0800 (PST)
This is a very dangerous way to lower your tower. As the tower becomes horizontal, so does your pull rope creating a lot of force. You need a higher support for your pull rope or use a tow truck. As
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00012.html (9,807 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:48:52 -0500
Dick, Please don't do this until you can get some onsite help. You're looking for trouble! As that tower gets near horizontal, the compression/buckling load from the cable will be LARGE, easily enoug
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00019.html (10,334 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:02:00 -0500
A friend of mine did this with a small (30') tower on field day. When the tower got down low it pulled the Jeep that it was attached to and slid the wheels. The tower swung out off center and crashed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00020.html (13,145 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:26:38 -0800
In my early days of experimenting with irrigation pipe verticals I encountered this problem, but it just wrecked some old tubing. Glad I didn't learn this on a tower. You really want to side guy the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00022.html (9,438 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lane <dieselburner@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:27:51 -0800
As I am sure you know, the forces grow quite high on the pull point as included angle of the strap approaches 0 degrees. Numbers for you to think about are: If the included angle is 60 degrees, the f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00023.html (14,861 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:29:09 -0800
The coefficient of static friction for rubber tires against wet asphalt can be as low as .25 Depending on what the jeep was on (grass?) the horizontal resistance it would provide at the key point in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00027.html (9,412 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:02:40 -0500
eice fori... interesting Video of the fellow on the fold up ladder on the falling derrick.. is not field day fun ? I have two 100' towers both with 50' of rohn 25 2 90 deg . and use it as the falling
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00029.html (11,056 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:57:01 -0500
I shouldn't really call it a falling derrick, I suppose. What I use is just a prop to keep the cable high enough to give lift when the tower is low. Our FD tower actually starts below horizontal, sin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00031.html (11,577 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:08:12 -0500
Since this is a Heights Tower you need the Screw operated hinged base. The two Heights towers had this at the base and everything cranked over OK. Heights used to advertise two guys standing on the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00032.html (9,103 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:42:51 -0600
I did it without the falling derrick, as I did not have room for one. My solution was power tools. You can see the pictures at www.kk0sd.net It is the first link. 73, Joe kk0sd --Original Message-- F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00040.html (10,684 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Gedas" <w8bya@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 21:18:38 -0500
Hi Dick, looks like you have had lots of very good suggestions. I too would very strongly advise against trying to use any passenger vehicle for your application. I have three 70' universal towers wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00071.html (13,352 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 18:31:48 -0800
That's fine if it works for you. I think what is underappreciated about the falling derrick is that you can have multiple ropes going from the falling derrick to different heights on the tower. This
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00072.html (10,581 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:41:29 -0500
OK...I have to ask. Are you taking about a fold over, or a hinged base? They are quite different. I The question was about a fold over, not a hinged base so I doubt a falling derrick would work well
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00075.html (11,687 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Question about lowering a Fold-Over tower (score: 1)
Author: Joseph or Ruth Patrick <hdmc38@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 17:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Hello Gedas  This is the best set up I have seen so far from the TT reflector. Great Design, cost effective, and appears to be VERY SAFE. Always The #1 issue in these situations. Congratulations you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00103.html (14,739 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu