Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Questions\s+on\s+my\s+tower\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: scsueepe@mtcnet.net (Mike King)
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:03:29 -0500
Hi all, its been a while since I have been on this reflector, need some info if you can spare the time. I have a US Towers HDX-555 - the heavy duty version, 55 foot crank up. It says it is rated for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00339.html (8,634 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 01:56:26 -0600
Mike, You really need to get a 70 MPH rating (assuming that is the maximum wind speed rating for your county. K7LXC can look it up for you). Note that the wind FORCE doubles from 50 to 70 MPH. IF the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00348.html (9,906 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:31:14 +0000
Tom, Not sure about this statement. I suspect dead weight is important to crank up towers. I know HAZER's have a dead weight limit. True, this is not a tower limit but one has to consider the entire
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00349.html (8,788 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: Mike A. King - KM0T" <scsueepe@mtcnet.net (Mike A. King - KM0T)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:54:40 -0500
Tom, thank you for the comment. However, I have been through all that 50 verses 70 mph debate verses square footage. I am in a 70 MPH zone, keeping my fingers crossed....... All I want to know is if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00351.html (9,488 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: w9jcc@juno.com (Frank C. Travanty)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:24:43 -0500
The Registered Professional Engineers Report dated 12/17/96, from US Tower, that came with my HDX-555, specifies a "Max. Allowable Antenna Weight (lbs): 200" On Tue, 15 May 2001 19:03:29 -0500 Mike K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00363.html (10,526 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: plplants@sgi.net (Paul Plants)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:54:36 -0400
Gust remember even though you live in a 70 MPH rated area as I do, you will get winds over that. Last December we had winds to 87 MPH for an 8 hour period. Overrate your equipment for safety! Paul N3
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00365.html (11,683 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: scsueepe@mtcnet.net (Mike King)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:06:54 -0500
Paul, Thanks for the tip. I am only loaded to 15 sqr feet, and I do keep it cranked down when not in use. Granted this does not help if I was to get lazey or gust forget to lower it. If you had a cra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00367.html (13,648 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: plplants@sgi.net (Paul Plants)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:31:21 -0400
Mine was is a Rohn HBX56 self-supporting with a 440 repeater antenna on it. It swayed a good bit but no damage. Paul N3WMV been last List Sponsor: Champion Radio Products - We'll be at the Dayton Ham
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00368.html (10,032 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:35:58 EDT
For many construction and engineering purposes, a wind is only worth considering when it reaches 70 MPH. And the TIA-222 windspeeds are every 50 years occurrences. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech List
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00369.html (8,788 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:54:58 -0600
Hmmm...that must mean I have seen 100 years worth in my 20 years in the country / county :-) One small tornado that took out dozens of my trees (including a 75 year old Oak and 75 year old Beech) wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00370.html (9,364 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: thurman@primenet.com (Pat Thurman)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:22:27 -0700
It might be worth clarifying a point about the '50 year occurances'... This '50 year' period is called the return period, or sometimes recurrence interval. It is a means of expressing 'exceedance pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00377.html (9,160 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Questions on my tower (score: 1)
Author: b_bradfield@yahoo.com (Brad Bradfield)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 05:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Kind of like a "50% chance of showers", right?? 73, Brad, W5CGH == __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00381.html (8,830 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu