Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG8X\s+rf\s+power\s+levels\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG8X\s+rf\s+power\s+levels\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RG8X rf power levels? (score: 1): Author: "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:57:58 -0800; I have been using RG8X for up to 600 watts output without any problems but curious if any of you are using for higher rf output levels? I am contemplating a slightly larger amp at our Oregon Coast su; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00227.html (7,042 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] RG8X rf power levels? (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:26:05 -0500; You will get different answers from different people depending on their success or lack of it with RG8X. My experience: Used a 100'+ run of buried RG8X to feed a 3-element vertical array on 40m using; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00228.html (9,008 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] RG8X rf power levels? (score: 1): Author: Jack - K4WSB <k4wsb@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:35:15 -0500; http://www.belden.com/index.cfm Jack Hartley K4WSB / VP2MSB ARRL - QCWA - OOTC DXCC Honor Roll _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTal; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00229.html (7,420 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] RG8X rf power levels? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:28:39 -0800; There's quite a few kinds of coax going under the name "RG-8X", so the datasheet may or may not help. Here are the considerations: 1) Melting the dielectric. The center conductor is pretty small, so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00231.html (8,610 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] RG8X rf power levels? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:38:14 -0800; As usual, Jim Lux has provided the best answers to your question. To expand on the statement above, the RG-numbers are VERY generic, essentially specifying the SIZE and impedance of the cables, and l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00234.html (8,855 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] RG8X rf power levels? (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:46:31 EST; RG8X? I've been using it at full power for contesting for years on my 80 meter loops and dipoles for years. I've never had a problem with it. It's great for that use since it is very light weight and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00235.html (7,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]