Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RS$T$\s+$was\s+Measured\s+S\-meter\s+dB$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RS$T$\s+$was\s+Measured\s+S\-meter\s+dB$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RS(T) (was Measured S-meter dB) (score: 1): Author: beaton@wintermute.co.uk (Alastair Beaton); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 11:59:26 +0000; As Readability and Tone can only ever be an operator's subjective assessment, is there any point in trying to make Signal an objective measurement? Some people give out RS(T) reports like medals - ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00383.html (8,147 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RS(T) (was Measured S-meter dB) (score: 1): Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 12:17:35 -0400; Hi Al (GM4BAP) and the TowerTalk gang, Thank you for saying what needed to be said... and doing it so well. One factor also seems to be neglected.... QSB and voice peaks. It drives me absolutely craz; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00398.html (11,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]