Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radial\s+wire\s+size\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radial\s+wire\s+size\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Radial Wire Size (score: 1): Author: "Stan Stockton" <stan@aqity.org>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:27:52 -0600; I am sure this discussion has been had before, However, I am putting up a 4 Square for 80M. I have available a huge supply of #18 copper wire with enamel (magnet wire) and could probably put down as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00819.html (7,905 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial Wire Size (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:44:33 -0500; It will work but certainly will degrade faster than larger gauge wire. All wire will degrade over time. Radials can be put out pretty fast, actually, if you use a good system. W0UN's system presented; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00820.html (10,157 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Radial wire size (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:45:02 -0500; OK, Guess I'll fess up. I have told many I have 1000 ft of radials down around my lowly Butternut BUT I haven't told many that I used 20 gauge (insulated, solid) wire. I used the small stuff as it wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00293.html (9,620 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial wire size (score: 1): Author: "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>; Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:56:36 -0500; No, larger wire only helps from a strength/breakage/corrosion point of view. You say you have 1000' of radials, but didn't indicate how many. As long as you have enough of them, the wire size is imma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00300.html (11,474 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]