Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radials\s+for\s+80\s+and\s+160m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radials\s+for\s+80\s+and\s+160m\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Radials for 80 and 160m (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:12:46 -0400; I shunt fed my 100 ft tower on 160 and I am thinking of 4 sq for 80m. What geometry of radials would make both 80m and 160m efficient? Normally, shunt fed 160 would need many radials around the tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00083.html (6,570 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]