Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rain\s+Static\s+vs\s+Feed\s+System\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rain\s+Static\s+vs\s+Feed\s+System\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: NB1B@aol.com (NB1B@aol.com); Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 20:49:32 -0400 (EDT); Can rain static be reduced by changing the feed system? The 3-stack of 4-element 20 meter beams all have their driven elements insulated from the boom, and during certain rain or snow conditions the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00639.html (8,197 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: force12@interserv.com (force12@interserv.com); Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 11:28:32 -0700; Good morning. I get asked this all the time! I also ask for input all the time, too. So far, there has been no definitive answer one way or the other. I have used both ways and had rain static on bot; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00686.html (8,667 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: mainhart@juno.com (Rick Mainhart); Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 13:37:02 EDT; Maybe! If the sole discharge point is at the antenna, within the feedline, or within the receiver (including the various interconnections, switches, et. al.) then changing the feed from a DC-open to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00712.html (9,025 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: grimm@alison.sbc.edu (Kenneth D. Grimm); Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 13:06:45 -0400; I did something very similar several years ago in Texas where the "put-put" type of precipitation static was very common. Typically the "put-put" increases in frequency (of "puts") and ends with an,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00748.html (9,766 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: lightfol@cadvision.com (lightfoots); Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 18:00:56 -0600; You described exactly what I hear also. Starts with a slow put pu, builds up to a ferocious roar, and ends with putting, 3 minute delay, then all over again. I have two TH6'ss on the tower stacked,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00752.html (10,790 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: dietz@texas.net (Chuck Dietz); Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 07:17:04 -0500; I get the impression that the slow "put put" is encountered during periods of slow rain. My thought was that charged drops made noise when they hit the directors on the beam and was more rapid as mor; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00758.html (8,881 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Rain Static vs Feed System (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph); Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 15:44:40 -0500; ________________________________________________________________________ Chuck, I hear the charged rain drops on my 40-2CD at 140 feet quite loud and it is different that the repetitive static build; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00768.html (8,962 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]