Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rainbow\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rainbow\s+Towers\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: "William Osborne" <wosborne44@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:44:46 -0600; Rainbow towers in Newton, NC seems to have excellent prices on Rohn BX series towers. Has anyone done business with them? If so how did it go? Can one climb the BX towers without too much trouble? Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00539.html (6,784 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:06:12 -0500; Bill: One caution about the BX series of towers. As Rohn literature states, they really are not designed for antenna booms longer than ten feet. Longer booms have a tendency to twist the tower in str; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00541.html (8,752 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:26:13 -0600; I know someone will point out that this is anecdotal evidence (it is), but I can show you a HDBX 48 that for years held up a HyGain TH11DX. The first time I saw it was the mid 90s. The HG came down i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00542.html (9,980 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:54:19 -0800 (PST); BX style towers are a PIA (pain in the ankle/foot) to climb. Every time I have climbed one, I have sworn never again but then another job comes along. Any tower without a flat to step on is a real pa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00545.html (7,285 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:19:42 -0500; Jim, My guess is that BX towers were designed the way they are so that we WON'T climb them. HA! I can appreciate someone wanting something that is self supporting, but I recall seeing in the old cata; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00550.html (9,686 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: Chuck <Chuck@dxham.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:34:03 -0600; And the specs say "Nothing with a boom length longer than 10 FEET!" Respect these comments. I did not and lost a bunch of antennas way back when ;) Learned my lesson and put up Rohn 45G. Chuck KØTVD; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00551.html (8,132 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:58:30 -0500; I agree 100% on BX tower. that's why I climb then foot inserted on the center of the X.. But on another BX tower note, They always a challenges of my faith and I test kick every brace while climbing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00564.html (11,844 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Rainbow Towers (score: 1): Author: Jack <k4wsb@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:02:01 -0500; Has anybody answered Bills' question? Jack Hartley K4WSB / VP2MSB DXCC Honor Roll QCWA OOTC "Celebrating 50 years in Ham Radio" _______________________________________________ _______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00565.html (8,247 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]