Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Antennas\]\s+377\s+ohms\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Antennas\]\s+377\s+ohms\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] 377 ohms? (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 16:44:30 -1000; Ok you antenna gurus, I read, somewhere in ancient times, that the permitivity and permeability of space resulted in an optimum radiation impedance for travelling EM waves of 377 ohms: the impedance; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00365.html (7,728 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] 377 ohms? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 08:55:23 -0400; Hi Jim, Unfortunately this 377 ohm stuff is the source of much voo doo and pathological science Jim. Claims vary from antennas that synthesize "far field" making a small antenna very efficient to oth; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00375.html (8,816 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] 377 ohms? (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 18:29:19 -1000; Aloha, And, thanks to all who have responded to my question. I now understand that the ratio of E to H in space has NOTHING to do with antenna design or use! However, I am glad I asked the question.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00412.html (7,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]