Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Antennas\]\s+Ground\s+System\s+suggested\s+for\s+QRO\s+Amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Antennas\]\s+Ground\s+System\s+suggested\s+for\s+QRO\s+Amps\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] Ground System suggested for QRO Amps (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 04:18:39 -0400; Hi Jim, Why drive a rod in at an angle?? What is the magic in the odd spacings? Such a small area ground could be a fair ground on 28 MHz and higher, but it would be a useless ground on 1.8 MHz. It w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00338.html (13,836 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] Ground System suggested for QRO Amps (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:30:20 EDT; hi. This particular scenario was a mystery to me also. I've *never* seen anything like this in any grounding reference. Generally the useful hemisphere of a ground rod is equal to it's length. That i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00344.html (8,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]