Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Force\s+12\s+Talk\]\s+C4\s+vs\s+C4s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Force\s+12\s+Talk\]\s+C4\s+vs\s+C4s\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [Force 12 Talk] C4 vs C4s (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (J. Kincade); Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:11:25 -0500; After comparing the specs on the two, kinda wonder why F12 even bothered to build the C4. There's hardly a hair difference in them, and the S is shorter and lighter and cheaper. Hmmm... 73, Jerry W5K; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00482.html (9,503 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: [Force 12 Talk] C4 vs C4s (score: 1): Author: ve6yc@home.com (Peter Larsen); Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 03:52:06 +0100; Many have stated that the longer boom has a narrower beam width, and better F/B: C4s C4 Gain F/B Gain F/B 10 4.4 16 4.4 18 15 4.7 17 4.8 18 20 4.5 14 4.6 15 So you can see from the numbers that the F; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00485.html (8,545 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: [Force 12 Talk] C4 vs C4s (score: 1): Author: ve6yc@home.com (Peter Larsen); Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 03:59:54 +0100; I guess this should have read one to two dB. It ended up looking like .5 dB. Sry. KN -- Peter J. Larsen http://members.home.net/ve6yc List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower sy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00486.html (7,784 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: [Force 12 Talk] C4 vs C4s (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:11:34 +0000; VE6YC posted: <snip> I believe the difference in performance is wider bandwidth on 28 Mc (not SWR but gain or F/B, as a result of the extra element which differentiates the standard model from the -S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00514.html (7,794 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Re: [Force 12 Talk] C4 vs C4s (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:08:44 +0200; The double sleeve on 10m is useful to broaden the bandwith that is smaller when using a director. Inherently, the double sleve has neglectable effects on gain and F/B. What helps (a bit) with a dire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00515.html (8,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]