Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[losses\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[losses\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [losses] (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 10:11:01 +0008; In the discussion of line and tuner losses, Ward wrote... It seems we often get fooled by such things. I remember acquiring a bunch of old but apparently good RG8 coax. Before I ran it "up the tower"; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00329.html (9,750 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: [losses] (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:42:20 +0008; Hi again, K7GCO wrote... I never said it was 100 feet. It was more like 80 or 85 feet, and it was at 29MHz. I do. I got several pieces of it free, from a good ham friend. Sure, but my point was not r; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00335.html (7,410 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: [losses] (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:02:35 -0600; If you test the internal automatic antenna tuners in many new transceivers you will find, even on a relatively small mismatch, that you can get 100W to the load with no tuner and only 80 or so with t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00337.html (11,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]