Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Anyone\s+not\s+need\s+a\s+permit\s+to\s+install\s+their\s+tower\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Anyone\s+not\s+need\s+a\s+permit\s+to\s+install\s+their\s+tower\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Anyone not need a permit to install their tower? (score: 1): Author: "Larry - K2GN" <k2gn@bhweb.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:04:26 -0500; Not required here. Call building office, ask if there were restrictions, they said there as a 35' structure limit. Told tower was a crankup that could go high and I got it because it was heavy duty b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00193.html (7,447 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Anyone not need a permit to install their tower? (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:50:46 -0500; I used <http://www.municode.com/> and local gov't websites to find my tower permitting answers. Not very interesting reading, but I can sleep well knowing that I didn't have to trust any knowledgable; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00197.html (7,711 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]