Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Please\s+confirm\s+your\s+message\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:45:52 -0500
I, also, have objections to that default, but Steve apparently thinks differently about it from almost everyone else. For now, I put up with it for the value of the other users on this list. Bill At
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00426.html (7,630 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:51:13 -0400
On the ham radio lists that I frequent, this default is much more usual than the other. Frankly, I prefer it this way. 73, Pete N4ZR At 09:45 AM 9/20/2004, Bill Aycock wrote: I, also, have objections
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00432.html (9,199 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Re: Fwd: Please confirm your message (score: 1)
Author: Michael Urich <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:48:52 -0500
Personally I think that email reflectors for discussion purposes should default back to the list. If this is a discussion list for us ALL to learn from, then why would you not want to post to the ent
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00444.html (8,355 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu