Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Isotruss\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Isotruss\s+towers\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:29:28 -0800; I was pretty impressed until I got to the following sentence in the instruction manual: Warning: Isotruss towers are not meant to be scaled or climbed. Do not climb this tower for any reason!! Oh wel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00264.html (6,745 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:47:15 -0800; That's what the bucket truck is for! The isotruss products are meant as replacements for steel or wood utility poles, not ham use, per se. Most utilities use trucks for doing any serious service work; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00269.html (7,827 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:27:52 -0500; Oh? They are supplied in heights to 300', and are specifically marketed as antenna support structures. Pretty big bucket truck, that. Their selling point is low cost istallation, but it's not so easy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00270.html (8,238 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:37:53 -0800; If you read the web site further, you will see that they tilt over for servicing, even the 300 footer. That's a feature not a bug, IMHO. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00273.html (8,032 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:29:32 -0500; Hi Rick, I've had the installation manual on my puter for months, and I actually read it. I see no suggested scenario where changing a light bulb, for instance, can be accomplished in less than a day; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00276.html (8,680 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:08:26 -0800 (PST); I have various tiltover masts and I leave the gin poles in place at all times for immediate service. My 90 footer goes down and back up in 15 minutes. I agree this may not work for every application; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00278.html (8,745 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:09:45 -0500; Steve Maki wrote: Oh? They are supplied in heights to 300', and are specifically marketed as antenna support structures. Pretty big bucket truck, that. Their selling point is low cost istallation, bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00280.html (8,637 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss towers (score: 1): Author: "David L. Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:24:33 -0500; I have gotten many replies but no one seems to have one of these. Go to eHam (W4AN's great web page) and look under reviews for towers. The link there goes right to the towers. Selected models are sh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00286.html (8,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]