Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+MORE\s+on\:\s+Heat\s+Shrink\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+MORE\s+on\:\s+Heat\s+Shrink\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: MORE on: Heat Shrink (score: 1): Author: "k4sb@worldnet.att.net"@worldnet.att.net (Edward W. Sleight); Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 00:13:00 -0700; Why I didn't think to use the WEB to look for the answer, I don't know. 5 whacks with the rittysnith accepted. Summary in case anyone else is interested. 3M, http:www//mouser.com, Newark Electronics; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00506.html (7,496 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: MORE on: Heat Shrink (score: 1): Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 11:03:52 -0700; Thanks, Ed, but enough begging of the question! :) What is the TT concensus regarding the use of heat shrink tubing to waterproof outdoor coax connectors/splices? And...if that isn't enough, has anyo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00507.html (7,741 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: MORE on: Heat Shrink (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 11:07:37 -0800 (AKDT); Heat shrink is not a good moisture barrier for connectors. CATV used it for some time and the results were not good. The Bell Blue Book says the wrapping next to the connector is the important barrie; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00508.html (7,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]