Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Need\s+Ideas\s+for\s+2\-band\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Need\s+Ideas\s+for\s+2\-band\s+Dipole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Need Ideas for 2-band Dipole (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 07:08:54 -0400 (EDT); Bob, The suggested trap idea might well be the best solution for the antenna to work on both 80 and 160, given that the single antenna is a constant in the installation equation. Tuning the trap to a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00384.html (8,627 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: Need Ideas for 2-band Dipole (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:54:54 -0400 (EDT); Bob, Might I add to to LB's suggestion that if youconstruct a trap dipole, use a high quality plenum coax to construct your traps. The silver-braided, teflon-insulated stuff may cost a few bucks a fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00400.html (7,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]