Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Non\-traditional\s+antenna\s+designs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Non\-traditional\s+antenna\s+designs\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:29:58 -0500; I certainly agree with almost everything you say. I'd never trust a review from CQ Magazine, no matter who the author is, because CQ has no technical editing or safeguards. Do you think that N6BT's; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00622.html (9,275 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:14:03 EST; I don't have any idea - I ain't a technical antenna guy. All I know is that it was a fun article and gave a new perspective to things. I have no argument with Schiller's ability to design pretty dece; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00625.html (8,295 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:54:24 -0500; I don't have any idea - I ain't a technical antenna guy. All I I can't recall what month and year that was, and I don't want to bother looking it up. I seen to recall it had a bit of hyperbole in it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00628.html (8,534 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:37:51 EST; Brilliant! Just trust Tom that dielectric in the coax doesn't contribute to losses. Some "evaluation" of Force 12 products. Yuri ______________________________________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00632.html (8,198 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Re: Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1): Author: davidw@copper.net (David J. Windisch); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:41:21 -0500; BIGSNIP Brilliant! Just trust Tom that dielectric in the coax doesn't contribute to losses. Some "evaluation" of Force 12 products. Yuri ADSNIP Hi, Yuri: I have difficulty following your posts, becau; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00635.html (8,101 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]