Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+The\s+Best\s+Antenna\s+\&\s+GAP\s+Verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+The\s+Best\s+Antenna\s+\&\s+GAP\s+Verticals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: The Best Antenna & GAP Verticals (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:51:57 -0400; Actually, in the world of 'the grass is always greener' and 'keeping up with the Joneses', the best antenna is the one that the other guy has that is bigger, wining more dx pile-ups, or just looks co; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00186.html (7,913 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: The Best Antenna & GAP Verticals (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 15:58:30 -0400; David, A GAP Challenger is the only antenna I've used since getting back on the air 13 months ago. I am very favorably impressed with it. Gets out great on 40m and 20m, OK on 10m, and so-so on 80m an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00191.html (7,522 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: The Best Antenna & GAP Verticals (score: 1): Author: n2cu@buffnet.net (Thomas R. Williams); Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 07:04:04 -0700; David, The Titan is similar in function, just different size and bands (WARC included). For reviews check QST - Jan 1995 and CQ - Mar 1990 for the Challenger and Monitoring Times - Aug 1996 for the T; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00209.html (7,723 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]