- 1. [TowerTalk] Re: The LXC Prime Directive (score: 1)
- Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 15:47:06 -0500
- (DO I don't want to pick on you Steve (I love your products and you're my favorite tower installer on the other coast :-), but I've seen two instances lately in which you've made recommendations con
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00079.html (7,769 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Re: The LXC Prime Directive (score: 1)
- Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 00:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Hi Dick, I'm not trying to critcize your critism either, but I am not sure I am seeing all you are seeing in the Rohn book. Regarding the use of pier pins vs imbedding section in concrete, I see, sp
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00119.html (8,777 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Re: The LXC Prime Directive (score: 1)
- Author: bcotter@pop.uky.edu (Bill Cotter)
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 12:05:31 -0400
- Dick& Stan, My instinct tells me that Rohn's pier-pin base mounting method might be just the thing if a large wind-load or torque moment would make the tower suscepible to twisting (and, potentially
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00126.html (10,043 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu