Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Recommendations\s+for\s+5\s+band\s+yagi\s+and\s+tower\s+upgrade\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Recommendations for 5 band yagi and tower upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Fredric Serota <fserota@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:59:47 -0500
Just received approval from our zoning board to increase tower height from 40 to 65 ft according to new statute in Pennsylvania. We plan to replace our 433HD with a TX455, which I am told will swap o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00472.html (9,953 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations for 5 band yagi and tower upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:41:34 -0500
If I were you I would purchase the K7LXC tribander report. That is the most comprehensive report out there. At the time the report was written there was no stepIR was not available for testing. The s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00484.html (11,718 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations for 5 band yagi and tower upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:05:58 -0800
I would think about a Steppir 3 element Yagi with the 30/40 dipole, it performs as good or better than other four element beams on 20, 15, 10 meters. The Steppir performs much better on 17 and 12 met
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00487.html (13,601 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu