Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Recommended\s+Coaxial\s+Surge\s+Protector\s+for\s+HF\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Jackson" <k9rz@radiks.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:48:41 -0600
Happy New Year! I have a question for the Group about the various brands of coaxial lightning protection. Without going into a lot of detail, I have a SPG copper buss bar in the basement that serves
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00492.html (8,837 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:51:21 -0500
I have PolyPhaser coax and control-line surge protectors, but they were all purchased before the company became part of the Smiths Group (to which Transtector -- of which I had not heard previously -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00494.html (10,030 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:20:44 -0500
Now that I have looked again at ICE's document comparing their devices with PolyPhaser's, and at the description of the Polyphaser devices on the DX Engineering Web site, I see that both say that Pol
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00495.html (7,485 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Rehman" <doug@k4ac.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:31:00 -0500
The common coaxial surge protectors use gas cartridges for protection. It takes hundreds of volts to cause the gas cartridge to fire and conduct to ground (off the top of my head, I think it is aroun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00496.html (7,692 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:24:25 -0500
I simply put 3 Mohm in resistors into the balun I built for my 160 vertical. I hope that will stop static from building up :) Other things can take care of real surges (eg. the gas discharge tube sur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00497.html (7,987 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:44:54 -0800
Here are just 3 sites from a simple Google search on "single point grounding" http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/qsl-lightning-protection3.htm http://www.w8ji.com/ground_systems.htm http://www.k1ttt.n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00000.html (10,925 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: Charles Coldwell <coldwell@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 06:29:57 -0500
MOVs typically have too high capacitance to be used at RF (it low-passes the signal). -- Charles M. Coldwell, W1CMC "Turn on, log in, tune out" Belmont, Massachusetts, New England (FN42jj) GPG ID: 85
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00001.html (8,674 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: Charles Coldwell <coldwell@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 06:31:17 -0500
You can get spark gaps (aka gas discharge) that will conduct as low as 90V. Its a might higher voltage than a MOV, but like I said upthread, MOVs have too high capacitance for RF. -- Charles M. Coldw
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00002.html (8,278 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:49:05 -0500
PolyPhaser at one time used solid state rather than gas discharge as all of the ones I have here are solid state. Unlike gas discharge they are not self healing. Of course any of them take a big enou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00003.html (8,556 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Recommended Coaxial Surge Protector for HF (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 16:43:55 +0000
You can easily check your lightning arrestor with a resistor and HV power supply. Use 500k-1 meg in series with the + lead. This will limit the current to 1 ma if the voltage is 1KV. Put a voltmeter
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00010.html (9,679 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu