Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Relay\s+Box\s+on\s+Tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Relay\s+Box\s+on\s+Tower\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Relay Box on Tower (score: 1): Author: rfman45 <rfman45@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:13:05 -0500; I am looking to install a remote antenna relay switch box (Rat Pack, etc.) to choose antennas at my tower. I would like to hear your opinions especially on the service life of them versus lightning-i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00228.html (7,363 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Relay Box on Tower (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:38:00 -0400; I would definitely mount whatever box you choose at the BASE of the tower. I would also recommend installing MOVs in the relays. John KK9A I am looking to install a remote antenna relay switch box (R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00231.html (7,732 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Relay Box on Tower (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:55:43 -0500 (CDT); Mike: I would install lightning arrestors on each of the coax lines coming into the box from antennas. These will protect the switch should an antenna be connected during a strike. 73 de Gene Smar AD; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00233.html (8,152 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Relay Box on Tower (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:48:20 -0400; I think it's more the installation than the choice of box. Some may be a bit more susceptible than others, but they are more or less just a bunch of relays. I have had a 6-pack at the base of the to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00241.html (9,414 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]