- 1. [TowerTalk] Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: "Terry Burkholder, N4TB" <n4tb@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 22:10:04 +0000
- Looking to replace my aging MFJ-239 with something that will do a bit more. Looking at the Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT. In particular the TDR function to analyze cables/feedlines. Does anyone have any ex
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-12/msg00015.html (6,814 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:56:02 +0000
- My friend n0dl has one and is very pleased. Have you looked at the Nano VNA? 73, Joe kk0sd Looking to replace my aging MFJ-239 with something that will do a bit more. Looking at the Rig Expert AA-230
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-12/msg00016.html (7,718 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Sole <hs0zed@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 08:57:40 +0700
- I have had an AA-230 Zoom for a couple of years, pretty much since it was first available and I rate it as excellent. The screen is not huge but it is reasonably bright. If I choose the right colour
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-12/msg00017.html (10,311 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 07:28:25 -0600
- I think Martin gave an excellent review of the Rig Expert analyzer. I have the AA-35 model that covers bands up through 10M and I can confirm just about everything Martin said about his model , which
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-12/msg00021.html (11,309 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: "Terry Burkholder, N4TB" <n4tb@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:09:59 +0000
- Many thanks to all who responded to my request for info on the Rig Expert AA-230ZOOMBT analyzer. All of the responses were positive. I have ordered one and am anxiously awaiting it's arrival.. Thanks
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-12/msg00069.html (7,451 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu