- 1. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1)
- Author: Mikey@a-o.com (Mikey)
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 21:07:14 -0400
- I have a Rohn HDBX-48 tower. I have purchased a KLM KT-34XA yagi. I am worried that this antenna may cause too much torque stress on the tower. I do have another tower, a Rohn 25G at 60 feet which is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00123.html (7,295 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1)
- Author: csudds@probe.net (Chuck Sudds)
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 21:16:56 -0500
- Mike! About 3 years ago I faced the same question that you face today! I was replacing my trusty old Mosley TA-33 that I had used for over 25 years with a new KLM KT34XA. Since I already had an HDBX4
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00126.html (10,095 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 02:51:40 EDT
- The 25G is rated for an antenna like this. The HDBX is not. The BX factory spec calls for a maximum 10 foot boom. The BX has very little torque resistance or absorption ability. The top plate and rot
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00129.html (7,802 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1)
- Author: wa3gin@erols.com (David Jordan)
- Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 08:40:33 -0400
- Mike, The secret to survival of these type towers is not to guy the tower but to guy the mast. I've had several of these towers. I run pipe all the way down to the tower base and bolt it to the base.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00133.html (8,301 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Rohn HDBX-48 (score: 1)
- Author: Mikey@a-o.com (Mikey)
- Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 19:51:58 -0400
- Thanks for all the replies concerning using the HDBX tower with a KLM KT-34XA tower, and the majority says NO....I will definitely use the 25G tower that I have.. 73, Mike W4SMG -- FAQ on WWW: http:/
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00152.html (7,038 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu