Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shortened\s+Elevated\s+Radial\s+Articles\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Shortened Elevated Radial Articles (score: 1)
Author: Dennis W0JX via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:15:26 +0000 (UTC)
To All:I apologize for not providing the reference to the Dick Weber K5IU article on the subject of shortened elevated radials. Here are the references: "Optimal Elevated Radial Vertical Antennas" by
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00217.html (8,428 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Elevated Radial Articles (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:10:34 -0500
Note this assumes a certain soil, consistent soil, 8' height and 80m frequency - some other charts show the interaction of these variables with gain so some interpolation of the various charts may be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00220.html (12,204 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Elevated Radial Articles (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:40:22 -0400
In my case, it's a fight with the local farmer who tedders the field for hay several times a year. The teddering machine sometimes gets down a few inches below the soil surface. Last season, the rad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00221.html (7,971 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Elevated Radial Articles (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:20:05 -0700
On 8/30/20 8:10 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote: There is a chart in the N6LF articles which shows the impact of radial length on field strength.  Figure 19.  60% would be 0.15 WL which is on his chart.  Rudy'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00223.html (10,535 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu