Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shorty\s+40\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shorty\s+40\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: Greg Clark <putt_1@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:29:38 -0700 (PDT); Folks, I'm in the process of rebuilding my station and am in need of a 2 ele 40m yagi. In the past I had an old 40-2CD by Cushcraft on the tower. In shopping around I have looked at: XM240 Force 12 (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00357.html (8,097 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:54:48 -0500; The XM240 is a fine antenna. I had the F12 40 and it is NOT a fine antenna (physically). I don't know about the other two. Bill, W5VX Folks, I'm in the process of rebuilding my station and am in need; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00359.html (8,690 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:01:54 +0000; I"ve had a F12 Magnum 240 up a few months now, replacing a Cushcraft 40-2CD that damaged by lightning. I think the F12 is a significantly better performer and has a bit wider bandwidth, as well. Barr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00360.html (10,051 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:53:52 -0500; Howdy Barry, I was using the EF version not the Magnum version of the F12 antenna. Possibly the Magnum has the problems fixed. I know that it is a larger antenna and costs quite a bit more. According; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00362.html (11,996 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:56:13 -0400; Bill, The one downside of the F12 40, as opposed to the Cushcraft: I used the Cushcraft very successfully on 12 and 17m. The F12 does not load on those bands, I presume as a side effect of its design; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00366.html (13,504 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:20:00 -0000; I'm not sure that linear loading is as efficient as some manufactures claim and some models require a lot of adjusting of the linear loading wires for the antenna to perform properly. I personally pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00377.html (7,978 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:51:36 -0400; I had a pair of 4 el KLMs and was never overly impressed by their performance. Before that I had a Hi-Gain 2 el and it was often referred to as a rotary dummy load. One of my KLM's has been sold and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00379.html (9,349 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:32:11 +0000; HOT DAWG !!! I got 288 Countries confirmed on a Dummy Load !!! 73, Dick, W1KSZ/7 I have looked at:> >> > XM240> > Force 12 (new and old linear loading the > > major> > shops in the US as of the end o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00381.html (10,724 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:43:46 -0400; Given enough time and DX Cluster spots you could do it with QRP. I have over 200 on 40 with 5W but I still dont like the KLM. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: RICHARD SOLOMON To: jeremy-ca ; jo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00382.html (11,377 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:53:11 -0500; W0UN, with W0UA op, entered CQWW CW single-band 40M from COLORADO two years in a row in the late 1990s. Using two KLM 4L40s @ 80 and 160 ft, as well as an M-squared 4L40 @ 80 ft for mults, W0UN/W0UA; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00383.html (8,052 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:56:19 -0000; There are different configurations of linear loading. Some antennas split the element and the loading wire runs toward the center of the element acting as a truss and some split the element further t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00385.html (10,447 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:56:41 -0000; The amount of countries worked has little to do with antenna performance. HOT DAWG !!! I got 288 Countries confirmed on a Dummy Load !!! 73, Dick, W1KSZ/7 -- into ____________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00386.html (11,549 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:06:31 -0400; Im sure you wouldnt fault your location or the sun spot cycle either. Other than that it only takes time and money Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ __________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00388.html (9,441 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:31:16 +0000; I will not even ask how you came about with that conclusion, but I am sure you will tell me (us). 73, Dick, W1KSZ/7 Oct 2007 00:56:41 +0000> CC: greg@k9ig.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40> --; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00391.html (12,289 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:46:10 -0700; Force 12's own website says their more recent coil-loaded Delta 240 is intended to replace the older linear loaded EF-240S, their explanation being: "The most difficult aspect of the antenna was tuni; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00397.html (8,777 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Chambers" <rwchambers@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:44:01 -0500; This weekend or maybe next, we (N5QQ/W5WW) should have Dave Leeson's 2 elem 40m MOXON up and running. Will offer our comments afterwards. K5MR got his up a few months back and seems to be pleased, we; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00405.html (10,312 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:39:57 -0600; Someone could probably make some money by marketing a sturdy, 2 element 40 based on Dave Leeson's Moxon-like design. A hint for CushCraft, M2 and W3TX. Force 12 need not even try ! 73, Steve, N2IC __; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00408.html (7,576 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:14:05 -0400; With all due respect to the mechanical engineers, but is there a real need for an antenna of double the weight and probably 4 times the selling price of a Cushcraft? Up here in New England the CC see; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00409.html (9,482 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:51:43 -0700; I've always liked the Moxon performance features (broad bandwidth, great F/B, smaller turning radius), and even considered buying the OptiBeam OB2-40M for a while until I decided to stick with the lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00410.html (9,301 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Chambers" <rwchambers@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:19:10 -0500; Second that.... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00411.html (8,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]