Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shunt\s+feed\,\s+interaction\s+and\s+elevated\s+radials\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Shunt feed, interaction and elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 13:09:01 -0500
I have finally concluded that the only way I'm going to get on 160 is to shunt feed my tower -- 100ft of Rohn 25 with a Force 12 C4 on top. Resonant antennas (inverted vees, slopers, etc.) all seem (
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00070.html (8,433 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Shunt feed, interaction and elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 08:43:30 EST
Hi Pete, N4ZN, at the risk of saying the obvious, Have you considered attaching elevated radials to your 25G tower, located say 30 degrees up the tower, sloping to the ground, to make the radiating p
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00122.html (7,757 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Shunt feed, interaction and elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 08:59:32 -0500
about 90 I have -- isn't that N4KG's feed system? -- but I'm concerned about the effect of the radials (1/2 wave on 80, more or less) cutting through the lazy-vee array for 80 meters, which is a real
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00123.html (7,928 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu