Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+AV\-640\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+AV\-640\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Speaking of AV-640 (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:54:44 -0500; I haven't used a vertical in decades and those were ground plane types when I was a poor young novice. I bought an AV-640 to use as a back-up or second antenna and I'm wondering what seems to work be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00189.html (7,166 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of AV-640 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:02:19 -0400; Gregg I use an AV-640. The feedpoint box is 7 ft above ground. Any closer and the tips of the droopy radials get close to the ground and that is not recommended. It stands out in the open on a tilt o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00190.html (9,025 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of AV-640 (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:00:45 -0400; As long as there is a good line of sight from the antenna to the horizon it should do well. That means I'd rule out mounted close to the ground, but at 24 feet it should do well as long as it's not n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00192.html (11,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]