Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Star\s+guys\s+vs\s+rotating\s+tower\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Star\s+guys\s+vs\s+rotating\s+tower\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Star guys vs rotating tower ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:06:25 -0700; Ok, heres something I dont get. Star guy setups.... with 6 guy wires. The idea is to reduce tower twist. I can readily see that vs a standard 3 guy wire ...per level setup. Then we have folks with a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00258.html (8,712 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Star guys vs rotating tower ? (score: 1): Author: Richard Thorne <rthorne@rthorne.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:17:15 -0500; Jim, I have a 140' rotating tower. We get regular high winds here in Amarillo. The last big wind storm was back in June when we had 80mph straight line winds. Both my towers/antennas survived nicel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00264.html (11,686 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Star guys vs rotating tower ? (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:53:55 -0400; I had a 143' R45 rotating tower (RTS with rotor at 40') .... and now have a 147' R55 rotating tower (K0XG w/ rotor at base) ... I can't say I've ever seen it 'twist' ... the whole thing turns and pul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00268.html (12,705 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Star guys vs rotating tower ? (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:49:22 -0400; There is probably no harm in some twist unless it oscillates like the Tacoma Narrows bridge. K4JA's rotating 200' AB105 tower with large 40m beams broke apart during very strong winds but no one know; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00277.html (8,868 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]