Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Stub\s+losses\s+\(was\s+connector\s+and\s+switch\s+losses\)\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Stub losses (was connector and switch losses) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:38:48 +0000
Interestingly, in the W9LT/K3LR-design lazy-vee parasitic array, the losses in the floating feedlines of the non-driven dipoles (which are open-circuited stubs) actually improve F/B ratio substantial
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00307.html (9,316 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Stub losses (was connector and switch losses) (score: 1)
Author: Chad_Kurszewski@css.mot.com (WE9V Chad Kurszewski)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:06:35 -0600
Ahh, but if you model them correctly, you won't be as impressed!! I was working on my own version of the above antenna for 80M and using a perfect X value (0 + j50 ohms). Antenna looked totally kick
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00308.html (10,364 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Stub losses (was connector and switch losses) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:49:40 +0000
None of this is a surprise. In fact, Chad's procedure is exactly what I did. Then I split the resistive and reactive components of the stub into 2 equal loads, placed as close as possible to the junc
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00319.html (11,487 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Stub losses (was connector and switch losses) (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:09:33 -0500
Hi Chad, A few dissipative ohms in the wrong place can make a big difference. Imagine a vertical loaded with a coax stub (one popular vertical does that, and advertises "no lossy traps"), or coax wou
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00336.html (7,698 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu