Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tarheel\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tarheel\s+Antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tarheel Antennas (score: 1): Author: Bob Bogash <bobby1@rbogash.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:45:29 -0800; While on the raising/lowering of vertical, and specifically Tarheel antennas subject, I am considering putting one of their Model 100 mobile antennas on my big metal roof, with, say, a 10 ft whip, ru; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00271.html (6,778 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tarheel Antennas (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:26:04 EDT; Good guy report! I bought my Tarheel antenna back in 2005. The internal mount broke. I called them and they told me to send back the defective part. Ten days later I received the repaired part...no c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00291.html (7,089 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tarheel Antennas (score: 1): Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:51:16 -0400 (EDT); Yes, they are good guys. I bought a used Tarheel, and the support has been just as good as though I had been the original buyer. Most outfits don't wanna talk to the "second owner" of anything. Not t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00300.html (8,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]