Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Teflon\s+Coax\s+with\s+Center\s+That\'s\s+NOT\s+SCCCS\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:13:07 -0800
All the 0.195-in o.d. TFE coax cables I can find have a center conductor that is silver-coated copper-coated steel. This is fine above HF, but it's not great for 160M and 80M, where the steel is cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00109.html (7,269 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 06:02:55 -0600
RG-400 Silver plated stranded center 1" bend radius .195" OD 50 ohms Choice by many for chokes Stan, K5GO Sent from Stan's IPhone _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00110.html (8,143 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 05:31:36 -0800
Can anyone point me to a 50 ohm TFE 0.195-in o.d. cable whose center is NOT coated steel? Likewise, they all have a solid center with a 2-in bend radius. Anyone know of one with a smaller bend radius
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00113.html (7,882 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:43:28 -0500
I did not realize until Jim's post that RG-142 has a steel center. I also use RG-400 which has a copper conductor and it works great. I use 75 ohm Teflon coax on 80m, now I am wondering what the cond
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00114.html (8,294 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:13:01 -0800
Thanks for the many responses.  RG400 is what I'm looking for.  Yes, the application is chokes. The cables for which I've found data sheets say 1-in one-time bend radius. Found what looks like a good
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00118.html (8,837 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:15:38 -0500
I have purchased Harbour Teflon coax many times and have not noticed any quality issues. John KK9A Thanks for the many responses. RG400 is what I'm looking for. Yes, the application is chokes. The ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00121.html (8,417 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:20:39 -0800
That's a great price, Dave!  Thanks. 73, Jim http://www.electroenterprises.com/index.cgi?quick_search=1&q_search=M17/128-RG400&page=1&iso=0&search_type=S&search_by=p.part_num&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIsoeT_J
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00122.html (9,488 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:16:10 -0500
Jim, RG-400 is excellent and easy to use with both crimped and solder connectors. I use it exclusively for all inside RF cabling. New and surplus-spool prices have been driven up during the last two
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00125.html (10,022 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:25:55 +0000
I Ditto Paul's sentiments. I exclusively use RG400 on everything past the 8X2 box. Searching the surplus's supply houses it shows up periodically. YMMV Wayne W3EA ________________________________ Fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00126.html (10,887 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:59:06 -0800
<All the 0.195-in o.d. TFE coax cables I can find have a center conductor that is silver-coated copper-coated steel. This is fine above HF, but it's not great for 160M and 80M, where the steel is con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00127.html (9,910 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:25:27 -0600
Again....  Times makes 3 part numbers that are solid copper, prfe dielectric, no steel.... Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original message --From: Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net>
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00128.html (10,535 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:32:02 -0800
Thanks Clay. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00129.html (9,182 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: Christopher Brown <cbrown@woods.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:33:42 -0900
Real M17/128-RG400 spec RG400 There are a bunch of "RG400"ish cables our there, so I only buy known maker with milspec id on jacket. I have about 100feet of Harbor M17/128-RG400 around, from 3 or 4 d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00130.html (12,112 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:56:27 -0500
For those that do not want to build their own, DX Engineering makes various lengths of jumpers using RG400 with Amphenol 83-1SP UHF male connectors (very high quality)on both ends. Hi pot tested and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00131.html (13,275 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 21:20:34 -0500
various lengths of jumpers using RG400 with Amphenol 83-1SP UHF male connectors..." Tim, Since RG-400 requires a UG reducer with a male PL-259 UHF connector, DXE may want to consider this ultra-supe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00132.html (14,937 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 22:56:58 -0600
I concur with Paul. I have been doing this for over 40 years with one exception. Rather than soldering the braid and then trimming it after soldering I found that trimming the braid with a pair of el
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00133.html (18,653 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Teflon Coax with Center That's NOT SCCCS? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:32:15 -0500
Hello Paul Yes, DXE cables (with UG adapters) are made using this ultra-superior method. The UG adapter is silver plated so it makes it even easier to solder the shield this way. 73 Tim K3LR various
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00142.html (16,277 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu