Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Testing\s+for\s+unbalanced\s+parallel\s+feedline\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Testing\s+for\s+unbalanced\s+parallel\s+feedline\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Testing for unbalanced parallel feedline (score: 1): Author: "Mark ." <n1lo@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:37:50 -0400; Hello All, I've been following the thread about improving the dipole with interest. I frequently recommend common 300 ohm TV twinlead as a feedline, transitioning to shielded parallel line before ent; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00642.html (7,389 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing for unbalanced parallel feedline (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:24:05 -0400; unbalanced by meter make a good You really should measure current balance at two points on the line by using a clamp-on meter. I know MFJ sells one I designed that is calibrated in amperes. It shoul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00659.html (8,471 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing for unbalanced parallel feedline (score: 1): Author: "Mark ." <n1lo@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:56:07 -0400; Thanks, Tom; Let me be sure I understand this. 1) If the meter's probe is large enough to encircle both conductors, do so and measure. The better the balance in current, the closer the meter reading; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00686.html (9,318 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing for unbalanced parallel feedline (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:01:28 -0400; conductors, do so the meter reading Yes! That's because the meter will real the true common mode current. (such as with distance along the *difference between This is just to give you an idea of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00693.html (9,287 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]