Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Thanks\s+all\.\.\.\s+N\s+or\s+UHF\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Thanks all... N or UHF? (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:28:31 -0400
Thanks for all the input on the N Vs UHF. I think there was a lot of information that wasn't in the archives. The reason for the question, as I think I stated, was to decide on which type of connecto
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00465.html (10,954 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks all... N or UHF? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:45:21 +0200
Yes, I think that is a better idea then cutting the jacket of braided cable for the ground strap. As well I have no problem doing that with my Heliax/Cellflex cables I also prefer there the grounding
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00466.html (7,703 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks all... N or UHF? (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:57:35 -0400
Roger: An elegant solution to your "real problem" ie grounding coax shield at the top of the tower. I use PL259's but the same solution works with N connectors. I use a bulkhead feedthru, double fema
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00468.html (8,875 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu