Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+AEA\s+VIA\s+Analyst\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+AEA\s+VIA\s+Analyst\s+$long$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] The AEA VIA Analyst (long) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:44:59 -0600; Hey gang... Here's the follow-up on my dead AEA SWR-121 I reported a few weeks ago. This unit was the original model sold by AEA about 15 years ago. Apparently it reached its EOL (end-of-life). The r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00163.html (10,166 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] The AEA VIA Analyst (long) (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:31:18 -0600; Instead of tearing into your antenna tomorrow, take the day off. It appears that you have the AEA VIA Analyst set to 75 ohm reference instead of 50 ohms. Your plots show a resistance of about 43 ohms; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00187.html (12,885 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] The AEA VIA Analyst (long) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:34:09 -0600; Hi Jerry, Thanks for the message, comments, and observations! BTW, the 160 meter Inv Vee is fed with 100' of RG-59/u coax. My understanding is an Inv Vee will present a better match to RG-58, but my; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00198.html (9,953 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] The AEA VIA Analyst (long) (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 15:13:49 -0600; Bob When I looked at your charts, I see an impedance curve hitting about 43 ohms at 1.8 Mhz (close as I can read it) and the reactance curve shows a transition at this point, so this is just 43 ohms; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00201.html (13,067 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]