Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+Bad\s+News\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+Bad\s+News\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:05:23 -0400; http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/ddtoday.html NPRM to eliminate CW requirements for all license classes A truly sad day.... KBØFHP __________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00481.html (6,862 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "Jerry K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:46:59 -0400; Um.... I don't see why it's such "Bad News" or such a "sad day"... the FCC is not proposing to PROHIBIT the use of CW... 73, Jerry K3BZ http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/ddtoday.htm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00482.html (7,782 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:04:36 -0500; Perhaps. But it will not stop the worldwide use of CW or the ubiquitous CW contests. And, as a VE, I can assure you it means less hassle for the typical VE session. 73, Keith NM5G http://www.fcc.gov/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00483.html (8,783 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:32:53 -0400; Although I'm primarily a CW-only op, I think its kinda good. I sure wouldn't want someone telling me I have to become proficient in SSTV or PSK31 or any of those other modes I don't care about in ord; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00484.html (8,427 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:35:08 EDT; 73, Jerry K3BZ THIS IS JUST ANOTHER STEP CLOSER TO HAM RADIO BECOMING CB RADIO. 73 DE WT8R, DAVE _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting To; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00485.html (7,311 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:22:10 -0500; Sorry fellas, I did not mean for this to go to the reflector. Finger problems again. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00489.html (8,142 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] The bad news (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:23:27 -0400; Well folks....there's bad news, and there's not so bad news. The BAD news is...my new house in suburbia has trees in places that make towers and beams a shoehorn problem. I have no idea how to work a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00490.html (9,148 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:40:47 -0700; I concur .. BUT I wanna say .. I still luv Charlie Whiskey. Don't take it away from me .. HIHI . Mark .. AA6DX .. DIT DIT.. .. -- Original Message -- From: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com> To: <kb0fhp@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00492.html (9,788 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] The bad news (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:24:22 -0400; will than the Sorry Jim, that just isn't true. That rumor probably comes from the fact many people using PSK don't understand radio systems very well. People listen to a receiver on 2-3kHz bandwidth; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00493.html (10,249 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "Bob Shauger" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:27:58 -0700; The good news is it will keep the "Nickel Extras" on phone. HI HI Bob W7KD I concur .. BUT I wanna say .. I still luv Charlie Whiskey. Don't take it away from me .. HIHI . Mark .. AA6DX .. DIT DIT..; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00499.html (10,708 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] The Bad News (score: 1): Author: "Bob Shauger" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 03:11:23 -0700; I am sure it is a matter of time before much of the CW bands will be displaced by future expansion of the phone bands. Hopefully, CW will not end up as a curiosity mode like AM. 73 de Bob W7KD One ca; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00501.html (12,555 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] The bad news (score: 1): Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:24:39 -0400; Tom, I definitely agree and couldn't have said it any better than you did! Congratulations on putting my exact thoughts into your tome. Don N8DE _______________________________________________ See: h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00504.html (12,043 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] The bad news (score: 1): Author: SavageBR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:44:57 EDT; most people don't want to learn technical things So true. If more folks only knew, The fun is not as much in the knowing as it is in the finding out! AA4Z ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00506.html (8,356 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] The bad news (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:46:21 -0400; Don, As I said privately to Tom, we're going to have to agree to disagree, on both my major points. There have been dumbasses on the air for as long as I've been a ham. They passed the code tests. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00507.html (13,257 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]