Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+Source\s+of\s+Anti\-Ham\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+The\s+Source\s+of\s+Anti\-Ham\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] The Source of Anti-Ham CC&R's (score: 1): Author: kbottles@rafn.com (Kim Bottles); Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 09:46:08 -0800; I noticed a local development here on Bainbridge Island had CC&R's that specifically did not allow ham radio antennas. So I called up the developer and asked him why he had that language in his CC&R'; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00630.html (10,331 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] The Source of Anti-Ham CC&R's (score: 1): Author: cdietz@swbell.net (Logan Dietz); Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:00:40 -0600; I think it would be very difficult to draft a constitutional law to void contracts between buyer and seller of property unless they restrict race, religion etc. That is probably why the FCC will not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00633.html (7,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]