- 1. [TowerTalk] Thoughts on this (score: 1)
- Author: "Its from Onion" <aredandgold@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 03:51:09 -0500
- This is the only mention of a ham tower in my city. Are they saying; 1. I can only have a tower 70 feet high? 2. Or if I have a business tower the accessory (ham) tower can only be 70 feet. Sec. 12.0
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00099.html (8,002 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Thoughts on this (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:31:53 -0400
- This is not a legal opinion, but as I read it, the first section lists antennas that are not accessory antennas; IOW commercial systems, be they transmitting or receiving. The section 12.1.A.4 (appli
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00100.html (9,537 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Thoughts on this (score: 1)
- Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:50:42 -0500
- Comments on bottom: This is the only mention of a ham tower in my city. Are they saying; 1. I can only have a tower 70 feet high? 2. Or if I have a business tower the accessory (ham) tower can only b
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00104.html (8,671 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu